Date index for Mar 2003


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [achievo] Bug in NF_TRACK_CHANGES? [was: Re: [achievo] PostAdd -> PostEdit for project class]



At 12.23 14/03/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,

Pietro Ravasio wrote:

$temprecord = $this->selectDb($pk);
$newrecordset = $temprecord[0];
$newrecordset["atkorgrec"] = $recordset[0];
$this->postUpdate($newrecordset);

What is different from the query that the NF_TRACK_CHANGES flag does?

Make an atk_var_dump of $record and look at the differences between $record and $record["atkorgreg"], for instance:


...
dependencies => array(0)
...
atkorgrec => array(...)
    ...
    dependencies => array(1)
        deps => array(0)
    ...
...

This for an empty sub-element, for filled ones, you'll get almost nothing:

...
phase=''
...
atkorgrec => array(..)
    ...
    phase => array(..)
       0 => array(..)
         id=...
         ...
       ...
    ...
...

I'm thinking to use PHP sessions to store in a variable that a node is changed in one of its element, but this would be really bad... (also because it wouldn't solve the problem to recover the changes, if not storing them in this session variable)

greets,
Pietro


Greetings,
Ivo

--
Ivo Jansch <ivo dot 
ibuildings.nl BV - information technology
http://www.ibuildings.nl



[ Achievo mailing list - http://www.achievo.org/ ]
[ to unsubscribe send an e-mail to achievo-unsubscribe dot 

-- Pietro Ravasio <pietro.ravasio dot  System and Network Engineer Abbeynet s.r.l. - http://www.abbeynet.it TEL: +390702109044 FAX: +390702109013


http://www.achievo.org/lists achievo.org - ©1999-2002 ibuildings.nl BV